🔗 Share this article

Critics have accused the German head of government, Friedrich Merz, of using what is described as “dangerous” discourse regarding immigration, following he called for “very large scale” removals of persons from metropolitan centers – and stated that anyone with daughters would support his stance.

Firm Response

Friedrich Merz, who took office in May with a pledge to combat the surge of the extremist AfD party, on Monday rebuked a journalist who asked whether he intended to retract his tough remarks on immigration from the previous week considering extensive condemnation, or apologise for them.

“It is unclear if you have kids, and daughters among them,” remarked to the reporter. “Consult your girls, I expect you’ll get a quite unambiguous reply. There is nothing to retract; in fact I reiterate: we have to change the situation.”

Opposition Backlash

Progressive critics alleged that Merz of taking a page from radical groups, whose allegations that women and girls are being targeted by immigrants with sexual violence has become a international right-wing mantra.

Green party politician Ricarda Lang, accused Merz of delivering a dismissive message for girls that failed to recognise their genuine societal issues.

“Perhaps ‘the daughters’ are also fed up with the chancellor being interested about their rights and security when he can employ them to support his completely regressive approaches?” she wrote on X.

Security Focus

Friedrich Merz declared his main focus was “protection in public space” and stressed that only if it could be guaranteed “will the established groups win back confidence”.

He had drawn flak recently for comments that opponents claimed hinted that multiculturalism itself was a problem in Germany’s urban centers: “Naturally we still have this issue in the urban landscape, and for this reason the home affairs minister is now endeavoring to enable and implement deportations on a very large scale,” commented during a visit to Brandenburg near Berlin.

Bias Accusations

Green politician Clemens Rostock accused Merz of stoking ethnic bias with his remark, which provoked minor demonstrations in multiple urban centers at the weekend.

“This is concerning when incumbent parties attempt to label people as a difficulty due to their looks or background,” remarked.

Natalie Pawlik of the Social Democrats, junior partners in the current administration, stated: “Migration cannot be stigmatised with simplistic or demagogic automatic responses – this divides the public to a greater extent and in the end helps the undesirable elements as opposed to fostering answers.”

Electoral Background

The conservative leader’s party coalition achieved a underwhelming 28.5 percent performance in the recent federal election versus the anti-foreigner, anti-Muslim AfD with its unprecedented 20.8 percent.

From that point, the far right party has caught up with the Christian Democrats, surpassing them in certain surveys, amid public concerns around immigration, criminal activity and financial downturn.

Historical Context

Friedrich Merz rose to the top of his party pledging a stricter approach on immigration than previous leader the former head of government, dismissing her “wir schaffen das” motto from the migrant crisis a previous decade and giving her some responsibility for the AfD’s strength.

He has fostered an at times more populist tone than Merkel, notoriously accusing “little pashas” for repeated destruction on the year-end celebration and refugees for filling up dental visits at the detriment of nationals.

Political Strategy

The CDU convened on Sunday and Monday to hash out a approach ahead of five state elections during the upcoming year. The AfD has strong leads in several eastern states, nearing a record 40% support.

Friedrich Merz affirmed that his organization was united in preventing partnership in government with the Alternative für Deutschland, a policy commonly referred to as the “protection”.

Internal Dissent

Nevertheless, the current opinion research has spooked some CDU members, leading a handful of political figures and advisers to suggest in recent weeks that the firewall could be untenable and harmful in the long term.

Those disagreeing contend that while the 12-year-old AfD, which national intelligence agencies have designated as radical, is able to criticize without responsibility without having to make the difficult decisions leadership demands, it will profit from the governing party disadvantage affecting many western democracies.

Academic Analysis

Researchers in the country have determined that mainstream parties such as the CDU were gradually enabling the far right to establish the discourse, inadvertently validating their proposals and spreading them further.

While the chancellor declined using the term “protection” on Monday, he insisted there were “essential disagreements” with the AfD which would make collaboration unworkable.

“We acknowledge this challenge,” he stated. “We will now also show explicitly and directly the AfD’s positions. We will separate ourselves explicitly and directly from them. {Above all